Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Michael Urbano

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn per sources found. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 21:27, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Urbano

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability outside the band. Redirect undone by a user with a longterm vendetta against me. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 19:16, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep -- Google brings up a fair number of hits that predate Smash Mouth.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:00, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Vendettas aside, I believe Mr. Urbano has generated enough coverage as an individual, seperate from any band affiliation, from third party – verifiable – creditable and independent sources, as shown here [1] to warrant a place here at Wikipedia. A rewrite warranted yes. Delete no. I have started adding sources and citing piece. Happy New Year. ShoesssS ^Talk 20:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep aside from SoV's comment the proper thing would be to discuss the redirect on the the article talk page with a pointer on the bands talk page. Deletion isn't an option here.--Cube lurker (talk) 20:21, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as he clearly meets musician biography criteria #6, as a member of two or more notable ensembles. Way more. Clearly notable. Cullen328 (talk) 20:48, 3 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.