Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Chaffe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Chaffe

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Won an award as part of a team; doesn't meet WP:ENT or WP:GNG. Boleyn (talk) 20:22, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:02, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 21:02, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:03, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: agree with nominator. Sulaimandaud (talk) 06:47, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, So Why 12:22, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Being one member of a team which won an award as a team is not in and of itself a strong basis for a standalone BLP, for the same reason that every musical band does not automatically get to spin off standalone BLPs of every individual band member if the band itself is the person's only notability claim and only point of sourceability. It would be enough if the article could be sourced to at least some evidence that Chaffe himself had been the subject of some media coverage independently of the team, but the only other source here is his own LinkedIn (which is not a notability-assisting source, because it's self-published.) Bearcat (talk) 14:12, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.