Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Gallay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete both--Ymblanter (talk) 10:04, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Mike Gallay

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP, relying exclusively on primary and unreliable sources, of a film producer with no especially strong claim of notability that would actually get him past WP:CREATIVE — and his company, which cites exactly no sources at all to demonstrate that it would pass WP:CORP. Delete both unless real, substantive sourcing can actually be found to salvage them with. Bearcat (talk) 23:24, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Bearcat (talk) 00:31, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:45, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete both for failing WP:N. If it can be shown that Gallay as a journalist meets WP:AUTHOR, I will amend my i-vote to suggest that Gallay/Hartt Productions be redirected to Mike Gallay. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 02:29, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete both. The production company simply fails to meet WP:ORG. As for the possibility suggested above that Gallay may meet WP:AUTHOR as a jounralist, that simply isn't the case right now as I see no coverage to indicate he is a notable journalist. The best clima for notability would be as a director. To that end, he is verifiably teh co-director of "The Manor" (see credit from Hot Docs film festival). However, that is a single peive of work, and the focus of coverage is on Shawney Choen. For example, see this story from Now Magazine Toronto. -- Whpq (talk) 15:48, 7 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.