Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mo Eazy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MelanieN (talk) 23:36, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mo Eazy

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

this article does not meet Wikipedia notability guidelines ,,,, there is NO evidence of Notability on this Article , Secondly the references on this article are not reliable Samat lib (talk) 18:23, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2016 June 5. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:51, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nigeria-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 06:50, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as too soon at best, there's nothing for any better signs of the needed notability, nothing to suggest an applicably better article. SwisterTwister talk 06:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete because there are no reliable sources. Tom29739 ^[talk] 00:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: A Google search of the subject doesn't show the subject passing the requirements of WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO. I was only able to find his rendition of Psy's "Gangnam Style", as well as information about his single "How?". Versace1608 ^{Wanna Talk?} 01:59, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.