Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mobile Application Usage in Tanzania

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. So Why 11:23, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mobile Application Usage in Tanzania

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not written like an encyclopedic article but like an essay. Does not provide a neutral point of view. Cannot readily be reworked to be a neutral encyclopedic article. Robert McClenon (talk) 04:58, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:02, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This reads like notes taken for an academic assignment, not an encyclopedia article. I would like to know whether this is part of a class's project to write articles for Wikipedia. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 06:17, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - would we have articles about mobile application usage in just about any country in the world? The first part of this article reads less like an article on mobile application usage in Tanzania than an article on mobile application usage in general, so arguably, this article could be re-written and just re-named "Mobile application usage". Vorbee (talk) 07:56, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tanzania-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:36, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - hardly anything here is unique to Tanzania. TimTempleton ^(talk) ^(cont) 02:01, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.