Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Chesworth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:24, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Molly Chesworth

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There isn't enough coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG, and I think that her filmography falls short of the WP:NACTOR guideline which stipulates that subjects should have had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.. Likely just WP:TOOSOON, as the subject appears to have only been active in the entertainment industry for about two years. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 21:55, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:11, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:12, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:13, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:13, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:14, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Obviously fails the WP:GNG and WP:NACTRESS. WP:TOOSOON applies. -- LACaliNYC ✉ 22:47, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 00:03, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agreed on WP:TOOSOON. I would suggest making this a stub page, but the sources just aren't notable enough. Contains only primary sources, blog reviews and IMDB. A search for more sources turns up little else. Betanote4 (talk) 15:43, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone explain why this page has been nominated for deletion? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tkmbartley (talk • contribs) 22:24, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Tkmbartley: As I wrote above, the article was nominated because it doesn't meet the standards of any of Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Guidelines which are specifically relevant to this subject are the general notability guideline (aka WP:GNG) and the subject-specific notability guideline for actors and entertainers (aka WP:NACTOR, and also part of the larger WP:NBIO. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:47, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Few mentions from GNEWS. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NACTRESS. At this point it is WP:TOOSOON. Lapablo (talk) 19:13, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.