Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moulton-Udell High School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was SNOW keep. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 22:27, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moulton-Udell High School

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

School without independent sources to prove notability. Fails WP:GNG The Banner _talk 15:06, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and improve, per norm that high schools are notable. AllyD (talk) 15:28, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's a high school, and it just needs to be improved a bit more, as it is already notable. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 16:24, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Why is it notable? And can you prove that with independent reliable sources? The Banner _talk 20:57, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and improve, high schools can be assumed to be notable. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:52, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:OUTCOMES. --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 20:06, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- My dear Sue, you now quite well that WP:OUTCOMES is not an argument for keeping an article. The Banner _talk 20:57, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  - Why, because you and the other minority deletionists say so? Don't be patronising. -- Necrothesp (talk) 00:23, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep High schools are considered notable. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 21:03, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:19, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close This has a snow chance of resulting in a deletion as described in WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES and Wikipedia:Notability (high schools). Mkdw ^talk 23:44, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep according to long established precedent for high schools. AfD is not the place for changing Wikipedia practice. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 00:15, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - looking at Google searches there are plenty enough sources that can be mined to establish compliance with WP:ORG. No evidence of WP:BEFORE due diligence.TerriersFan (talk) 01:17, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Per Wikipedia:Notability (high schools) and WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES. Northamerica1000^(talk) 08:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Verified secondary school, which should be kept for all the usual reasons. -- Necrothesp (talk) 00:21, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: A brief search shows me this subject meets WP:GNG. Anyone with microfilm access to the Daily Iowegian should be able to find many additional sources. Please note that school name may have slightly varied over time. You can fine lists of graduates from the early 20th century as "Moulton High School." Likely the Udell was appended at a later time.--Milowent • ^hasspoken 14:00, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.