Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mounao Thoibi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 14:46, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mounao Thoibi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems pretty clearly non notable. I can't find any significant independent reporting about this film, only blog, a Facebook page, and a load of download/watch online sites. Chazchaz101 (talk) 14:49, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Expended searches:

director:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

story:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

screenplay:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

lead:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

studio:(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

and for Indian topics, WP:INDAFD: "Mounao Thoibi" "Romi Meitei" "Laishram Santosh" "Rakesh Rosha" "Bala Hijam" "RT Films"

Comment: As the topic does seem sourcable away from the social media and download sites which speak toward even the most notable of films, it is not so "pretty clearly non notable". I'll do some work before reporting back. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 17:52, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:40, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - was waiting to see if there was any improvement. I can't find anything to help, and in its current state doesn't pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:57, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.