Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Murshid (TV series)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 20:21, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Murshid (TV series) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

References are unreliable as they are churnalism and WP:NEWSORGINDIA. Tagged for notability hoping better sources would be introduced but tag was removed without improvement. The only bylined sources I found were this which is churnalism based off a press release (there are a few others you will find in a WP:BEFORE, and this which is three paragraphs and about one of the actors (only a paragraph about the series). Likely WP:TOOSOON since it hasn't even been released. CNMall41 (talk) 18:43, 25 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The web series have efficient reputed news media links. There is no promotional materail. There is no reason to delete it. Please keep the article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arshadkhanwriter (talkcontribs) 19:01, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Draftify or Redirect to List_of_ZEE5_original_programming#2024. The series has not been released yet. 9 sources on the page and of that no. 3,6,7,8,9 are unreliable sources and others have no significant coverage. Maybe after the release the series might get better coverage in reliable secondary independent sources and if so, I would reconsider my vote. RangersRus (talk) 13:36, 29 August 2024 (UTC) Changing vote to Keep. Series got significant coverage after release with many coming from reliable sources. I too added two reviews under reception after review and cleanup of unreliable sources. Editors can add more reliable sources for further expansion but so far good enough to pass notability. RangersRus (talk) 12:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, some of the existing coverage is now on the page. -My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 06:38, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.