Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naika Foroutan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Nomination withdrawn. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 7 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Naika Foroutan

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG. President/leader of a few non-notable academic societies. I've tried to find any independent coverage on her and found little to nothing. A few interviews, but interviews are not by themselves indicative of notability, and an article from DW with a one-off mention of her. She is a professor at Humboldt University but I'm not sure that makes her notable. Jaguarnik (talk) 06:58, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator - the arguments made by the editors below show that Foroutan indeed does have notability, being well-cited in her field and having a study that she conducted receive coverage by DW. I made a mistake. Jaguarnik (talk) 19:39, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:10, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:10, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iran-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 07:10, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. Full professor at Humboldt is suggestive of likely notability (although not passing any notability criteria by itself), and I think she has anough citations (four publications with triple-digit citation counts in Google Scholar, with two more close) for WP:PROF#C1, for someone who writes in German in sociology. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:07, 22 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 10:28, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:46, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I think she meets WP:PROF. The DW article is more than a "one-off" mention, the article is about a study she presented. With the Qantara.de interviews, I think she just about scrapes by in notability for inclusion on Wikipedia. Her work is oft cited [1][2] within the German sociology field, with a lot of her work receiving over 50 citations, and a fair few of her publications receiving over 100. -Asheiou (they/them • talk) 13:06, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

On second read, this is correct, and I didn't read thoroughly. That's my mistake. Jaguarnik (talk) 19:35, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. The DW article is solid, the rest seem ok. The citation factor shows she's at least somewhat known in her field of study. Oaktree b (talk) 14:38, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.