Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nazia Ali

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 14:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nazia Ali

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Biography of a "novelist" whose two books are a cookbook and a first novel, both self-published via XLibris. The sources are a British Bangladeshi "who's who", a directory where anyone can buy an entry and where content is supplied by the subject, and a piece in a small-circulation newspaper for the British Bangladeshi community which is pretty obvious PR. Guy (Help!) 20:56, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Doesn't meet general notability or notability for authors.PohranicniStraze (talk) 02:56, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:41, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete total failure of BLP rules, which exist to keep us from Wikipedia being turned into Linkedin. Some days it seems we are loosing that fight.John Pack Lambert (talk) 06:17, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Mar11 (talk) 06:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Her books, whose WP links point circularly to the article itself all show single-digit holdings in WorldCat. This is a fan page or booster page. Agree with JPL. Seems more and more that WP is devolving toward becoming a directory of all of humanity. Agricola44 (talk) 15:59, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not notable author....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:55, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete মাখামাখি (talk) 14:59, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.