Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neusport F.C. Green 98'

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:42, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Neusport F.C. Green 98'

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not establish the notability of the particular soccer team. Contested prod. ... discospinster _talk 15:31, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. Giant Snowman 08:53, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - non-notable soccer team, hasn't played at a high enough level to merit having an article about it. Giant Snowman 08:54, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Why should this even need an AfD? No references, no citation on the highly POV claim to notability, which is contradicted by the stats suggesting they have only ever won 2 matches, and apparently only an U11 team to report fixtures for. Get out of here. Kevin McE (talk) 10:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably the "98" in the title refers to the birthdate of players and therefore signifies that this article is specifically about the under-11 team, which only reinforces how non-notable it is..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:15, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, the article says "U11/12". Giant Snowman 11:06, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - non-notable youth team Spiderone 06:51, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Per nom. GauchoDude (talk) 23:56, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.