Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nithin Kamath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. While the nominator is a confirmed sockpuppet, other editors have commented sufficiently to see a consensus for deletion. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 10:12, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nithin Kamath

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject does not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for biographies. AgentCody 02:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AgentCody 02:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. AgentCody 02:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AgentCody 02:48, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

strike per WP:SOCKSTRIKE and this. -- Toddy1 (talk) 07:45, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This has sources but the independence of these is doubtful. There was a very good discussion at nomination of another page that said WP:RS is not as important as how the sources are written and what they are saying. He is a big man for sure, but doesn't seem to qualify the guidelines. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 18:18, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep If magazines such as The Economic Times and Forbes cover him that is enough to establish notability.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:49, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Comment : No opinions on this. But doesn't being a billionaire indicate that he is notable enough for an article (Considering that he is self made and made his fortune in India, where a billion dollars is a lot) ?. Jupitus Smart 17:11, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:28, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The sources are not giving him enough significant coverage. Just getting covered in economic times and Forbes does not make anyone notable.The subject must have significant coverage. The source from Economic times is more like an interview whereas the forbes barely gives any coverage. Poppified ^talk 15:49, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Procedural keep as nom is a sock. If any other editor wants to renominate this article to AFD please do so later. VV 15:55, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Based on the arguments by Nomadicghumakkad and Poppified. Alphaonekannan (talk) 08:43, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.