Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/North Morgan

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

North Morgan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Borderline notable at best: being short-listed gfor a first-book prize is not a significant "award". The refs in the Independent by themselves are not enough, especially since the books are litlte-known despite the promotion--Worldcat shows 18, 11, and 10 libraries.[1]. More important than all of that is that the article was created by the publisher of one of his books, and then edited almost exclusively by two undeclared paid editors, both now banned . He does need a good deal of additional advertising to become well-known, but we are not the place for it. DGG ( talk ) 00:34, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 19:12, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Greece-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 19:18, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch 19:19, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.