Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Padmakar Patil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 14:06, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Padmakar Patil

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-Notable politician! Being a Zilla Parishad Chairman doesn't fulfill Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Sliekid (talk) 07:30, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:17, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:17, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article sourced to records of the subject's unsuccessful election campaign and inclusion of his name in a batch of appointments but containing unreferenced biographical details. The candidacy and party roles fail WP:POLITICIAN and my searches are not finding other grounds for notability. AllyD (talk) 08:23, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Thank you to the distinguished editors for pointing out their concerns with the article. Regardless of the outcome if the page is kept or deleted, I respect the high standards maintained at Wikipedia. With all due respect, my argument to keep the article is that the person in reference is a noteworthy politician and has served on state boards of the Karnataka state government in India. Please let me know if I can add any more references to support the case. Thanks! Sandeep Gadila (talk) 08:35, 15 November 2020 (UTC)Sandeep_Gadila[reply]
Delete: None of the positions he held make him meet WP:NPOL and I failed to find any significant secondary coverage about him (not even local, although I only searched in Latin script). - Tristan Surtel (talk) 18:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.Faizal batliwala (talk) 13:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - does not meet NPOL and I can't see them getting through on GNG either Spiderone 11:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.