Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Lacey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 23:48, 19 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Lacey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD; non-notable youth player who fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 12:24, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:26, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

keep He is not a youth player, he is in senior team therefore is a professional.Seasider91 (talk) 12:32, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no evidence of first team appearances [1], no significant coverage, does not yet meet WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG criteria. Deserter1 12:37, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Without significant coverage, he is not notable unless he makes a first team appearance. See WP:GNG, and WP:NSPORT. Sir Sputnik (talk) 01:05, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Argyle 4 Life^talk 05:20, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.