Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paula R. Pietromonaco

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Randykitty (talk) 21:49, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Paula R. Pietromonaco

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable professor. Sources from associations are standard resumes. Yoninah (talk) 20:26, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Yoninah (talk) 20:26, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:30, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:30, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:30, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Meets WP:PROF#C8 as editor-in-chief of Emotion. IntoThinAir (talk) 21:48, 20 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. also passes WP:Prof#C1 with 16 publications with over 100 cites each. Did nominator do WP:Before? Xxanthippe (talk) 01:23, 21 June 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Keep: Editor in chief of journal Emotion (journal) passes the bar of WP:PROF#C8. Is it "major well-established"? Well, running since 2001, published by a major academic society, indexed everywhere you'd expect. Ticks enough boxes. PamD 08:29, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Emotion (journal) is an APA journal with an impact factor of 3+, which makes it important in the field of psychology. Meets WP:PROF#C8 as editor-in-chief. QuakerSquirrel (talk) 16:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Along with the passes of WP:PROF#C1 and C8 already noted above, she appears to pass #C3 as a fellow of multiple scholarly societies [1]. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:15, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Snow keep in accord with passing multiple criteria of the applicable guideline. XOR'easter (talk) 15:18, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. This is an odd AfD nomination to come from a person who has "This person makes women blue" on their user page. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:27, 24 June 2019 (UTC).[reply]
Let's not personalize this, please. 28bytes (talk) 22:36, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, For she is the editor-in-chief of Emotion, and for her other acheivments mentioned above Alex-h (talk) 10:04, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Article doesn't overwhelm you with GNG noteworthy coverage, but her citation counts are impressive and she appears to be the lead author on many of them. I believe WP:NPROF is met. Papaursa (talk) 00:16, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.