Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paulo Tocha

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 08:57, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Paulo Tocha

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP with no independent sources. He has no significant coverage and nothing to show that he was a notable kickboxer or martial artist. There's also nothing to show he was notable for his acting roles so he fails WP:GNG, WP:KICK, WP:MANOTE, and WP:NACTOR. Mdtemp (talk) 21:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 00:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 00:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 00:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 00:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are no independent sources so he doesn't meet WP:GNG. There's also no evidence to support any claims he meets the notability criteria for actors, kickboxers, or martial artists. Papaursa (talk) 18:33, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Insufficient references from reliable sources to support notability. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 03:06, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.