Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Paylogix

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 01:23, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Paylogix

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reads like ad, no claim of notability. ViperSnake151 Talk 23:49, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. This is a glorified press release. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:33, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 09:33, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - it's a press release. Neonchameleon (talk) 11:41, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete under WP:CSD#G11 - author's contribution history suggests paid editing. Also delete the related article Consolidated Billing (which I just changed to a redirect). ~Amatulić (talk) 00:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I changed it back since you're redirecting to a page that will probably be deleted soon pending this outcome. That article should also be G11'd. ViperSnake151 Talk 00:11, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.