Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Planet Human

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is to delete based on policy (✉→BWilkins←✎) 22:41, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Planet Human

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG, single facebook self ref. MJH (talk) 03:34, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not notable --Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 01:16, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:29, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran ^{talk to me!} 09:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 December 15. Snotbot t • c » 17:11, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Dieselboy - Probably too soon, considering the label was founded this past February and there isn't much content to establish notability. Google News found nothing useful and this is probably because it is too soon. SwisterTwister talk 19:25, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.