Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pondicherry urban area

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:39, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pondicherry urban area

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, no indication of notability, seems to be just a failed extension of the Pondicherry article The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 20:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. The C of E God Save the King! (talk) 20:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article's content is already covered in the Pondicherry article. HarukaAmaranth (話)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:01, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Is the urban area defined by the central government or its statistics agency? In the United States. individual metropolitan statistical areas are notable and the topic of articles. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 22:23, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete already covered in Pondicherry as noted and it appears completely unsourced. Should not preclude the possibility of recreation if someone puts the work into a better GNG-passing article. SportingFlyer T·C 09:50, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.