Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Powerglove

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Power Glove. Stifle (talk) 08:47, 16 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Powerglove

Subject fails WP:BAND. No major label releases. The Real Libs-speak politely 17:51, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Power Glove, potential search term for notable product after which the band is named. --Explodicle (T/C) 19:40, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, "It has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician/ensemble itself and reliable", and it says any one of the following criteria. It has some sources (could use more still), but still, a major label release is not SPECIFICALLY a requirement. ViperSnake151 22:44, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Power Glove per Explodicle. Can find nothing that passes any of the 12 criteria of WP:MUSIC. Of the 2 refs on the article, 1 is just a reprint of the details of one of their album. While proving verifiability, it does not prove notability. WP:MUSIC#C1 calls for multiple non-trivial published works, and only finding the one, it just doesn't quite pass yet. Willing to change vote if more are found mind you. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 01:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.