Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PrismaStar (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 21:41, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

PrismaStar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This company managed to generate a burst of PR content around the time it moved to the UK but lacks sustained coverage by reliable independent sources. Survived AfD in 2009. I can’t find any sources other than those provided, which are:

Refs 1 and 2 are to primary sources, establishing that the company has patents, not that it is notable.
Ref 3 is apparently a blog (dead link to Facebook)
Ref 4 is a brief blog entry that just links back to the company’s own ‘About Us’ web page.
Ref 5, 6 and 7 are interviews with the founder
Ref 8 is a blog
Refs 9 and 10 are the same piece, published first in a blog and then republished by the Washington Post
Ref 11 blog
Ref 12 reliable source
Ref 13 awards website.

Therefore despite limited coverage in a couple of reliable sources I don’t think this meets our notability threshold. Mccapra (talk) 07:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 07:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not enough sources out there to write a non-promotional article. This article is a promotional piece. – filelakeshoe (t / c) 🐱 10:21, 19 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.