Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/QBit Semiconductor

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

QBit Semiconductor

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small company not meeting WP:ORGCRIT requirements for depth of coverage (i.e. non notable). ☆ Bri (talk) 04:20, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:54, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: fails WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. --K.e.coffman (talk) 01:15, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for reviewing the article. I would like to request Wikipedia keep the article at this time and allow for more content to be added. Currently there are three sources/articles written about the company and hopefully more will come in the near future. I appreciate those reviewing the article consider keeping it for now to allow more time for additional content to be added. Thank you Klizb67 (talk) 20:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 05:47, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. WP:CORPSPAM. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:30, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a fairly clear WP:NCORP failure; per the sources cited in the artilce, the company had <50 employees worldwide in 2017; when added to the fact that the company has yet to accrue significant coverage in WP:RS, it is hard to make the case the topic is notable.--SamHolt6 (talk) 15:08, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - To date there are three articles written about the company and all are reputable sources. Klizb67 (talk) 18:07, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Even reliable sources must be judged on their depth; for example, NCORP (the criteria for judging a company on its notability) is clear that press releases, standard business announcements, and list articles do not work to establish a topic's notability. Every source cited by the article in question runs afoul of NCORP in one way or another, and a check for more online does not assuage these doubts.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:34, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NCORP states the press/coverage needs to be significant, independent, reliable and secondary. The three press articles cited meet all of the criteria. All three are Secondary, Independent, Reliable sources and the coverage is significant. The MFP article is over 2000 words, The Business Next article is over 1000 words. Apple Daily is the shortest coverage with approximately 450 words.Klizb67 (talk) 19:09, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 17:53, 1 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "I have created an article for QBit Semiconductor. The company is a small start-up and currently does not have a lot of written coverage.". MER-C 11:52, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.