Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rasharkin United F.C.
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep for Rasharkin United F.C. and no consensus for Roe Valley F.C. with leave to speedy renominate the latter. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:39, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Rasharkin United F.C. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
PROD contested on the grounds it meets WP:FOOTY criteria, however per WP:BURDEN there is a burden on the creator to establish how articles meet criteria. This article is basically unreferenced, other than the fact it exists, which is not enough to warrant an article on Wikipedia. Cloudz679 12:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Cloudz679 12:44, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I am also nominating the following related page under the same criteria:
Cloudz679 12:50, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - PRODs contested because the clubs are "eligible to participate in national cup competition", which is indeed a standard over at WP:FOOTBALL - but alas those claims are completely unreferenced. WP:RS to WP:V please! GiantSnowman 12:53, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - sources have now been found showing a valid claim to nptability. GiantSnowman 08:40, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment An unsourced article is not reason to delete, at least give the article creator a chance to find sources before delete !vote. Mo ainm~Talk 12:59, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The article was created 11 months ago; how much more time would they need? Dru of Id (talk) 13:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Can play and have played in a national cup competition per source I provided above. Mo ainm~Talk 14:40, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- And what about Roe Valley? They only played in the preliminary round, which doesn't count. Do you have a reference for them, too? Cloudz679 14:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't look, only checked for Rasharkin, quick break from work. Mo ainm~Talk 14:48, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Found [1] showing Roe Valley played in National Cup. --HighKing (talk) 15:41, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep As per ref showing they played in national cup. --HighKing (talk) 15:35, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Passes WP:FOOTYN. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Passes WP:FOOTYN per sources provided. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 07:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:21, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.