Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ravi Khangura

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Michig (talk) 08:37, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ravi Khangura

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity/Hoax page for a non notable actor. Claims to have acted in movies in the Call of Duty franchise (which don't exist) and some other non notable Indian movies without any reference to back this up. Fails WP:GNG. Was A7ed, but the tag was removed by @AaronWikia: without any explanation. Jupitus Smart 04:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Jupitus Smart 04:27, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Given that the subject's claim is multiple roles in the Call of Duty franchise, I guess the other A7 tag removing editor perceived that as a credible claim of significance (I might have not removed the A7). I have to agree with the nominator – with no reliable or unreliable source available to even confirm the character played in the Call of Duty franchise, leave alone the subject's significance, this article fails GNG and BIO. It's a clear Delete, even Speedy if any admin drops by. This seems to be a name being added to multiple articles across Wikipedia to perpetuate either a hoax or plain vandalism. Lourdes 06:39, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: seems like a clear hoax. Searches gave nothing and there are no Call of Duty movies yet.ArcticDragonfly (talk) 16:44, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
DeleteAs previously stated, not notable enough, no reliable source. Vanity project or hoax, I don't know, but this doesn't need to be in an encyclopedia. Socerb102 (talk) 01:25, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I don't know whether this is an outright hoax or a real wannabe who's trying to get himself into Wikipedia by falsely claiming more notability than he really has — but either way, it's entirely deletable. Bearcat (talk) 16:49, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.