Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reed Arvin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 13:33, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reed Arvin

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NAUTHOR, had been BLP deprodded because of his homepage, Google does not give any independent, significant coverage of himself, only listing his books CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 10:36, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, meets WP:NAUTHOR, number of library holdings reflects that works are "well-known" (Blood of Angels, over 350 libraries), (The Wind in the Wheat, over 150 libraries), (The Will, over 300 libraries), (The Last Goodbye, over 500 libraries), plenty of reviews (some wikinotable enough for own wikiarticles) ie. for Blood of Angels: Kirkus (here), The New York Times (NYT) ((needs subscription) here), PW (here), The Denver Post (here), Booklist (here); The Last Goodbye: NYT (here), PW (here), Kirkus (here), Booklist (here), Library Journal (here); The Will: Library Journal, PW, Booklist (reviews here), Kirkus (here); The Wind in the Wheat: Booklist (here). Coolabahapple (talk) 05:47, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Coolabahapple. Eccekevin (talk) 19:02, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I have added some of the listed above sources onto the article because we do not want an article sitting sourced only to the subject's own website. There is a lot more work that needs to be done in improving the article, but Arvin does meet our inclusion criteria.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:11, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Coolabahapple and Johnpacklambert. I've also found a cite for the claim about Gene Simmons optioning one of his books and made its wording a little more encyclopedic. Vaticidalprophet 09:21, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep meets WP:NAUTHOR. Sonofstar (talk) 19:44, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.