Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricardo George

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 18:45, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ricardo George

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD fails WP:NFOOTBALL having never played in a fully professional league per WP:FPL, no sign of GNG JW 1961 Talk 18:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. JW 1961 Talk 18:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. JW 1961 Talk 18:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. JW 1961 Talk 18:15, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

==should be maintained as he played professional soccer in the National Independent Soccer Association club Atlanta SC.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Elop76 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Elop76, Unfortunately, that is a third tier league in the USA and is not listed at WikiProject Football WP:FPL where the list of accepted leagues is maintained - anyone is welcome to propose additions to that list if they can provide reliable sources JW 1961 Talk 20:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. Giant Snowman 21:47, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - only source I could find is this video which is not enough to satisfy WP:GNG on its own Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:59, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 23:10, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - mentioned in official website of the professional league www.nisaofficial.com/roster/mickey-george , NISA should be added as a league to fulfill criteria, how can that be proposed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Elop76 (talk • contribs) 11:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

At WT:FPL, you can request it and provide sources to support your case. You can see that a discussion already exists for NISA. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:36, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG and has not played in a fully-professional league. Consensus is that the NISA is not fully professional, and thus has no presumption of notability. Jay eyem (talk) 20:54, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails both WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTY. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:30, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.