Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ricky Martinez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The others can be listed later on. Please wait a few days. Bearian (talk) 22:39, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ricky Martinez

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non Notable Pornstar. Fails WP:PORNBIO as he has not won "a well-known and significant industry award" & WP:GNG as has not "received any significant coverage in reliable sources". Finnegas (talk) 18:27, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am also nominating the following related pages for the aforementioned reasons:

Withdrawn by nominator. I am taking onboard Gene93k's & Erpert's concerns about the articles needing to be evaluated individually. In addition, I would like to clarify I did carry out the 'prescribed WP:BEFORE procedure'. Moreover, I would like to highlight I have no Knowledge of Finnish to understand any 'articles from Finnish newspapers and magazines' which may exist concerning ‎Henry Saari. Finnegas (talk) 11:51, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So you makes WP:BEFORE about a Finnish person ignoring sources in Finnish, and about a Japanese person ignoring sources in Japanese... interesting! It's pretty obvious that in cases of non-English speaking people you should search sources in their native language, otherwise you cannot say that a person fails GNG. If you haven't enough language skills and you're also unable to use easy translation tools such as Google Translate, you should simply stop to nominate people whose sources reasonably would be in a language different from English, period. As far as I can remember you were already warned about that, but you keep to nominate for deletion non-English people and then to justify your lack of WP:BEFORE with the same lame excuses. Sorry, but if you keep on waste the community time, I will not esitate to report you for disruption. Cavarrone 15:00, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let me get this straight you intend to report me for not conducting a rigorous enough WP: BEFORE? Finnegas (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First, your WP:BEFORE is blatantly non-existent. Second, sure, if you keep on abusing and misapplicating the deletion policy and you keep on wastling the community time I will report you to AN and I will ask for having you banned from AfD processes (it would not be the first case), especially as you were warned multiple times about your deficiencies, and you apparently and knowingly refuse to fix them. Cavarrone 15:52, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Finnegas (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Finnegas (talk) 18:45, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:53, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. The only thing these bundled nominations have in common is that they are porn stars. I suggest listing them separately so that they can be evaluated individually. • Gene93k (talk) 18:57, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment has the nominator made the prescribed WP:BEFORE procedure before nominating all these articles for deletion? I checked Henry Saari and a few minutes were sufficient to found a dozen articles from Finnish newspapers and magazines about him (and one was already included in the article). Not yet checked Nozomi Aso (ie 麻生希) but there is an Expand Japanese template on the top of the page and the Japanese article lists, among the references, at least three reliable sources (the weekly magazine Friday, the monthly magazine Cyzo, the news website Zakzak). Cavarrone 20:22, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy close. I'm neutral about notability, but as Gene93k hinted at, there is no valid reason for these articles to be bundled in the same AfD. Aside from them all being porn stars, they have nothing in common; in addition, the articles were all created by different editors. Erpert ^{WHAT DO YOU WANT???} 07:05, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, speedy close and apply WP:BEFORE before any further nomination per what said above. Cavarrone 07:52, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Per sourced award won. Sportfan5000 (talk) 02:07, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.