Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbie Crawford (footballer)
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I think that G4 actually did apply, BTW—Kww(talk) 22:49, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Robbie Crawford (footballer) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Article was previously deleted per AfD (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Robbie Crawford), but the G4 was declined with the rationale "page is not identical". The article is about a footballer that fails WP:NFOOTBALL. The references in the article is just match-reports and a player-profile in addition to one news-story after he signed a new contract. But it's not "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject", so the article fails WP:GNG. Mentoz86 (talk) 14:50, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Mentoz86 (talk) 14:51, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - He still has not played in a fully pro league or received significant coverage, meaning the article still fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 14:54, 3 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:20, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 12:17, 4 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in Scottish task force's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:46, 5 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.