Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roman Heart
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep - passes WP:BIO. Sources will need to be inserted properly into the article to aviod another AFD discussion. Non-admin closure. D.M.N. (talk) 16:40, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Porn star bio tagged for no sources since 9/06 David in DC (talk) 04:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- oppose - most of the uncited claims just use the movies he has been in as the basis for the claim, which makes finding a secondary source for such a trivial claim somewhat difficult. The subject is notable, as he won the GayVN newcomer of the year award; the article needs to be touched up instead of deleted.-Todd(Talk-Contribs) 12:22, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The GayVN Award is a major award in the field. Here is a source for his win, from the San Francisco Chronicle, 20th largest newspaper in the US according to our article (though they seem to have the date wrong). Another source. --AnonEMouse (squeak) 13:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. AnonEMouse (squeak) 13:34, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Please note that user David in DC is stalking every page I have ever posted, apparently intent on mischief. He has already blanked this page once. Anyone interested in this page should keep an eye on it and contact me on my talk page if further problems arise from this user. If he repeatedly blanks this page, you may want to request a block and let me know on my talk page.John celona (talk) 13:56, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and cleanup. He passes WP:BIO per Grabby and GayVN award wins. Sources easily found and added. • Gene93k (talk) 14:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm persuaded. Keep. But will someone who thinks this article enhances the project please take the time to fix its citations. 16 months is way too long. Does anyone know if I can shut this AfD down or if an admin must?David in DC (talk) 15:38, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.