Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roshani Chokshi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) KCVelaga (talk) 00:20, 12 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Roshani Chokshi

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I created this article in October 2017, but am now thinking it was WP:TOOSOON and I'm not sure there is WP:SIGCOV. Looking for more recent coverage did give me an LA Times article from April this year, but I can't access it as I'm in the EU. Tacyarg (talk) 09:34, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Tacyarg (talk) 09:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:47, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Missouri-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 10:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I added the essay Nom mentions to the page, it's an essay by an author in the same genre Chokshi writes in, not a reported article, but, still, the Los Angeles Times. Also just added the review that ran in the New York Times. I can see more sources in a search on her name, and her debut book did win prizes. I appreciate article creator's revisiting the notability quesiton, but I think we're there.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:54, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, E.M.Gregory - I think her first novel was a finalist rather than a winner? Tacyarg (talk) 19:00, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm looking at the reviews (of which I added only a couple to the page,) and at articles about her form which page can - an d should - be expanded. Passes WP:AUTHOR.E.M.Gregory (talk) 21:49, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per E.M.Gregory. Satisfies WP:AUTHOR. James500 (talk) 10:38, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.