Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruins & Relics
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy keep, nominator withdraws nomination and no other delete !votes. (non-admin closure)Quasihuman | Talk 20:28, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Ruins & Relics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet WP:NBOOK; neither significant coverage found nor won a major award. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:12, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It has received sufficient coverage ([1], [2], [3], [4]) and was nominated for the McAuslan First Book Prize.[5] --Michig (talk) 14:55, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Withdraw nomination - not sure why most of those sources weren't showing up on search. (Possibly searching with & - actual title - instead of and?) ---Nat Gertler (talk) 15:05, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.