Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruth Myers (handwriting analyst)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:10, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
- Ruth Myers (handwriting analyst) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
BLP cited mostly to non-independent or tabloid sources. A search for alternatives finds the same. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 17:00, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete This source seems suitable to me, if we could find another source discussing her in similar detail that may be enough. However I searched but could find nothing else. Lots of mentions of her, but no in-depth coverage.--Pontificalibus (talk) 17:19, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:36, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete short apparences in TV as an expert in some subject do not make one notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.