Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/S paul academy
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Redirect to Saint Paul Academy and Summit School. --Titoxd(?!?) 04:53, 2 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
S paul academy (redirected)
[edit]Tagged as speedy for being a hoax. I haven't really looked into it, but it's not a speedy candidate unless it's a really obvious hoax (ie utter nonsense). No vote for now. -R. fiend 04:42, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. This is not a hoax but a good schools article. The grounds for deletion is that Ann Bancroft is listed as an alumni who went to Antartica. Our article on Ann Bancroft states that she did as does this page [1]. The actress was Anne Bancroft. This is not a WP:CSD candidate as I have stated on the article talk page and should be delisted from this page. There is a school by that name see [2] in Minneapolis and our article should be renamed when this article is kept.Redirect to correct article as per Rob. Capitalistroadster 09:35, 27 October 2005 (UTC) Capitalistroadster 05:27, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]- Keep. An AfD nomination for F. Scott Fitzgerald's school. You have to be kidding me.--Nicodemus75 07:45, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Saint Paul Academy and Summit School, then possibly list on Redirects for deletion. Kappa 07:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Redirect to Saint Paul Academy and Summit School. Keep the re-direct, only to discourage a repeat. --rob 08:42, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: The only difference in the two articles (I see) is an attack/nonsense paragraph labelled "Security" which I removed. If nobody does it first, and nobody objects, I'll just put in a re-direct. Perhaps an admin could protect a redirect, to stop a repeat. --rob 08:53, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: I'm curious, does wikipedia have any tool for comparing differences between two articles, which shows results similiar to what we do for different versions of the same article? That would have been really handy here. --rob 10:26, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect, Speedy or otherwise. Alf melmac 10:47, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect. Attack clone. --Vsion 10:54, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I went ahead and did the re-direct. This AFD is effectively over in my opinion. Since the copy had attack/nonsense in it, it constituted vandalism, and I feel anybody is free and welcome to deal with vandalism. I suggest the closing admin put page protection in place. --rob 11:04, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the redirect and close this AfD down. --Jacqui ★ 14:31, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, original was a hoax.Gateman1997 17:57, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- keep and please protect the redirect so it is not vandalized any more Yuckfoo 21:02, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy redirect as per rob. Silensor 19:34, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.