Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salmar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 18:51, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Salmar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable fictional figure. This article has no references, not even primary ones, and I can't find any that would demonstrate SIGCOV or pass GNG. The other Maiar articles have been soft deleted and redirected to Maiar, so I would find that acceptable too. Hog Farm (talk) 16:33, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 16:33, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science fiction and fantasy-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 16:33, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Hog Farm (talk) 16:33, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This character is far too obscure to have an article of his own. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 17:22, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: minor character in a minor work.--Jack Upland (talk) 23:41, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Hyperbolick (talk) 19:11, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It is just crazy how minor of characters we have given articles to. If we were to give all characters who are mentioned at the level of Salmar articles, we would probably have 90% of our articles be on fictional characters. We would no longer have complaints about too many articles on footballer or porn starts, because we would only complain about articles on characters mentioned vaguely in just one work of fiction.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:49, 26 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete since subject fails WP:GNG. -The Gnome (talk) 00:14, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per my prod rationale (fails GNG). --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:52, 30 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and JPL. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 14:17, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.