Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Salt extraction process

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:48, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Salt extraction process

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable research paper; the article is not about salt production in general, but one specific procedure described in a 2005 research paper. Walsh90210 (talk) 23:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Walsh90210 (talk) 23:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Unfortunately, all sourcing is primary; it has peer-reviewed articles about it, all by the same authors identified in the opening paragraph of the article. Gscholar still brings up the term as recently as 2015, but it's still by these same authors. Until we have sourcing from others, we can't use their own articles as sourcing. Oaktree b (talk) 00:28, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Could not find any secondary reliable sources on the salt attraction process, and I have to concur that this article fails the criteria under WP:GNG. Wolverine XI ^{(talk to me)} 13:29, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete doesn't have enough important information or reliable sources. It repeats what other articles on salt production already cover. Yakov-kobi (talk) 20:00, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.