Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sana-Software
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 18:41, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sana-Software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Notability not established, possible COI editor. Article creator (User:SanaSoftware, definitely a COI, already indef-blocked for username vio) may be the same user as User:Brambo123, who started editing when the creator was blocked. [flaminglawyer] 00:54, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:49, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:50, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete It is sourced to its own customers websites. That is not RS. Miami33139 (talk) 01:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete no real indepth coverage, mainly passing mentions [1]. LibStar (talk) 05:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, likely speedy delete, a non-consumer tech business (develops .NET software platforms for e-commerce, e-learning, and web content management) blowing its own horn. The non-words "e-commerce" and "e-learning" should be grounds for speedy deletion per se, but any text containing them is sure to be obvious advertising. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 14:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.