Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sandeep Sunar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. – Joe (talk) 16:44, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sandeep Sunar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am also nominating the following related pages for the reason, below:

Part of a set of cricket biography articles that have been created by the same user, all of which fail WP:NCRIC. See the related discussion at WT:CIRC, and the user's talkpage. The user has been advised on what the minimum requirements are for these type of articles. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 17:41, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Manjul Bhattarai is an Umpire , Kajal Shrestha, Sonu Khadka and Rekha Rawal has played worldcup T20 Qualifier as you can check there references and rest are thew U-19 worldcup players. Let me tell you U-19 worldcup also listed on ICC worldcup. I have created this articles by lots of hard effort. @Lugnuts: did you checked all the references before submitting for AFD ? Kushal Bhurtel is the player who have played ICC worldcup qualifier too. So, I request admins to take some serious action aganist this user. MTKASH^{TALK Contribs} 19:36, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kushal Bhurtel was only named as a reserve for 2 games in the World Cricket League games: he didn't actually play. How about you check all your articles for untrue statements / exaggerations, as I've found similar errors in at least 4 of them. Spike 'em (talk) 13:52, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:47, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:47, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 04:47, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete - weak only due to the sheer volume of articles, not all of which I have checked. U-19 cricketers (which several of these are) are not notable, and there are many spelling and other errors as well. Perhaps this editor's page creations should be discussed at WP:ANI. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:31, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. They've been made aware of the notability requirements, so there's a red-flag on any future creations. I also suspect that this isn't their first account on WP, but that's another issue which will be dealt with separately. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 08:40, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I've been through all the articles; the only ones I'm unsure on are the female players. I don't know how we would classify the qualifiers they have played, and whether they would be at a similar level to the final clause of WP:CRIN : "has appeared as a player or umpire in at least one World Cricket League match of Division Six status or above" They are T20 games, whereas WCL is 50-overs. There are many errors in the articles listed with false claims of notability. I've removed as many as I can, though I have undoubtably missed some. Spike 'em (talk) 14:01, 20 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Spike. I hadn't really dug any deeper than the basic failing of N:CRIC, but the extra incorrect BLP issues is a bigger concern. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 07:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the whole lot. We really need to lock at writing a new cricket notability criteria that will make it even easier to get rid of even more articles on non-notable cricket players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:20, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.