Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Murray (field hockey player)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) f e minist 01:05, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sean Murray (field hockey player)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have been unable to locate many reliable independent sources. Fails WP:NSPORT, WP:BIO, and WP:GNG. Adam9007 (talk) 15:10, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 15:20, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 15:22, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. Doesn't seem to meet WP:NSPORT or WP:GNG. There is some coverage but most is trivial ROTM sports coverage and match reports that are otherwise to be expected. Nothing to indicate broader notability. At best a case of WP:TOOSOON. Guliolopez (talk) 18:25, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep. He has played for a national team in the FIH Hockey World League.[1] There is no specific guideline in WP:NSPORT for field hockey, but in most other sports, an international cap makes the subject notable. The article would be bolstered by more coverage in reliable sources. However, I think the best course for the article at this point is to improve sourcing rather than delete. I'm willing to revisit the matter in six months if no sources turn up after searching. —C.Fred (talk) 19:16, 17 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 11:01, 25 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 21:42, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 22:29, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.