Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seanbrian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:34, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seanbrian

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

DePRODed by creator without addressing the issue(s). Concern was: 'No indication of importance or significance. Promotional. No reliable, in-depth coverage.' Fails to meet criteria at WP:CREATIVE. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 04:00, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly promotional, the page creator's username is the acronym for "Hollywood of the South, Georgia" which is the page subject's production company name (so COI and username issues, too). All the roles listed are bit/extra parts or indy productions that never went anywhere, all links are self-promotional. JamesG5 (talk) 04:02, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:47, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:47, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 04:57, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with storm and fire: Nom said it all; there's no notability criteria this wannabe actor/auteur would ever meet. Ravenswing 11:13, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Their reach may extend "beyond our boarders with relationships overseas" ([1]), but since the subject seems to be neither involved with a boarding house, snowboards or surfboards, I'm just going assume that this is a terribly written article about a non-notable person. Their inexplicable commitment to the pseduo-mononym... combined with the fact that this apparently is a thing that exists, is just too much cringe for even the internet to handle. The only think that kept me from nominating for speedy was the unsourced list, which probably squeeks by the "fundamentally rewritten" criteria, since it is, after all, most of the article, and the only part that doesn't need to be immediately removed, assuming it is actually source-able. Either way, even if it were, wouldn't establish notability. TimothyJosephWood 14:18, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Obvious promotional page from non-notable COI editor is obvious. --Guy Macon (talk) 06:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.