Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sensis

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator(non-admin closure). Joseph2302 (talk) 11:19, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sensis

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Firstly, I just need to know if this is the correct procedure - can I create an article on a page marked as a disambiguation page, or do I have to request its deletion? If it's the latter, it is the reason for this request. If not, please disregard and I will go ahead and edit the page.

(Alternatively, would it perhaps be better to rename the page Sensis_(disambiguation)?)

I need to create an article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sensis solely about the Australian company Sensis.

Each of the other businesses listed on this disambiguation page have extra words in their name so it shouldn't be a huge issue to not have a disambiguation page, but I am still happy to add a hatnote linking to either the other two pages or a new disambiguation page at the top of the Sensis article I end up creating. Please advise if this is the correct procedure or not.

(For reference, Sensis is currently listed under a sub-section on the Telstra page - we are no longer fully owned by Telstra and as such would like a separate Wikipedia article.) I work for Sensis and have declared this in my profile. CS at Sensis (talk) 02:11, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2015 June 10. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:27, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As stated on Talk:Sensis, there is no evidence that you are the primary topic that people search for when looking for Sensis- all 3 are valid search criteria. Therefore under no circumstances should this legitimate disambiguation page be deleted and replaced by an article for your company, per WP:DISAMBIGUATION. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:48, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, as I already explained at Talk:Sensis, "Each of the other businesses listed on this disambiguation page have extra words in their name so it shouldn't be a huge issue to not have a disambiguation page." is not a valid reason, you have to show why it's the primary topic, and why people searching for Sensis will almost always be looking for your company and not the others. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:54, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request withdrawn Here the nominator has requested a withdrawal of this AfD- I will be closing it shortly. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:17, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.