Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shahida Parides
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete under WP:G11. (non-admin closure) K.e.coffman (talk) 05:19, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
- Shahida Parides (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails Wikipedia:Notability. Brand does not seem to have gotten detailed coverage as such. The references are just to photos of celebrities wearing it, but there is no detailed commentary on the brand, sometimes the brand isn't even mentioned. GRuban (talk) 20:04, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:07, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:07, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SoWhy 07:44, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Triptothecottage (talk) 04:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Triptothecottage (talk) 04:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as unambiguous advertising. Article consists of name checks of the celebrities that wore its products, as well as a section on "Affiliate Program". Article created and extensively edited by various SPAs, including (apparently) by the company itself: Special:Contributions/Shahida_Parides. I'll request a G11; let's see if it takes. K.e.coffman (talk) 20:58, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.