Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sharjah Wanderers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 06:37, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sharjah Wanderers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:Before check shows that the article does not meet WP:ORG and lacks WP:ORGDEPTH. Possibly a WP:ADPROMO. nirmal (talk) 05:36, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. nirmal (talk) 06:30, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Golf-related deletion discussions. nirmal (talk) 06:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. nirmal (talk) 06:31, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep How very ironic. The article was created by me, it's not a promo and is as sourced as its going to get, given that it's a small members only club important to the British and sporting communities of the Emirate of Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates. However, I do note it comfortably passes WP:ORG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:28, 24 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, per above seems to have enough sources available to pass notability. Okaye Agongo (talk) 15:11, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 03:53, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep seems to meet GNG. Elli (talk | contribs) 08:50, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep sources examined meet GNG. --Whiteguru (talk) 11:48, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It meets notability. Suggest the noms to demonstrate his point. Sonofstar (talk) 13:27, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.