Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Simron Upadhyay

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There is a consensus here that none of the available sources are considered reliable, and therefore the subject fails the notability standards. If better sources can be found this article can be restored and approved through the AFC process. – bradv🍁 03:39, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Simron Upadhyay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actress. One program is not sufficient to justify Actor Notability. It must have multiple significant roles in different programs and it has only one. fails WP:NACTOR, WP:GNG. DMySon 07:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. DMySon 07:13, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:18, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hi,

I am Nalbarian, creator of the page "Simron Upadhyay".

This is an article about a famous artist Simron Upadhyay. She is much popular for her roles in Belgali TV and Film in West Bengal, India and Bangladesh.

References for this articles are given from leading news papers of India. You are requested to consider this articles. If any improvement needed, please advice.

Her other notable works are:

She started her career in Dance Bangla Dance(2009-2010)

Other Works (TV): 1)Raage Anuraage

2)Bedini Moluyar kotha

3)Care korina

4)Thik jeno love story

5) Ki kore toke bolbo

6) Ke Apon ke por

Movies: 1) Suitcase

2) Classroom

3) Raja raani raaji

Award-Star paribar Jury award for Care Korina

Kindly give me a day to add these works, too. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nalbarian (talkcontribs) 08:42, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, article has been modified. Please review and close the matter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nalbarian (talkcontribs) 04:13, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. TJMSmith (talk) 14:04, 28 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 01:26, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
A Bengali article from a reliable news source is fine but YouTube certainly would not Spiderone 13:03, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Request for review Any conclusion on this page? Article has been updated with maximum possible references. I think you can take a decision now. Nalbarian (talkcontribs)
  • Comment The main problem is that the references appear fine until you look at them The Times of India's entertainment pages are not a helpful reference because they have been deprecated at WP:RSN and the other source looks similar. If the verdict is delete please can we do this without prejudice to future re-creation via AFC. The creating editor was previously unaware that sources do not need to be online. Fiddle Faddle 15:08, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Personally, I'd be fine with it being recreated in the future if there is sources to support it's notability. That said, it should totally be with caveat that it has to go through the AfC process and I'd suggest that whoever re-creates it puts the effort into finding good sources before doing so everyone's time isn't wasted. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:38, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.