Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SingTel Grid Girls

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Feel free to redirect if you feel like it. SarahStierch (talk) 00:13, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SingTel Grid Girls

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a non-notable obscure tv-show that existed some years ago. damiens.rf 15:30, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 16:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 16:07, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:24, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Usually I'd try to defend this with some kind of argument that every show has some notability. This, though? It's literally a reality show to pick attractive women to hold flags for a race. Probably why it's now reduced to an Internet vote; nobody wants to spend eight weeks watching a show about picking out flagholders seen for a small amount of time in an F1 race. Nate • (chatter) 08:37, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Possible redirect to Singapore Grand Prix as a possible search term, since it was once part of the buildup to the grand prix (albeit a minor one), but if it's shown that this was so minor it really didn't matter much to the grand prix then delete. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 11:16, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SarahStierch (talk) 01:06, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.