Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartDebit

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 00:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SmartDebit

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:CORPDEPTH, lacks significant coverage in independant, reliable sources. Cobbled together from press releases, their own website and a peripheral mention in The Telegraph. Thinly veiled attempt at SEO, misuse of hq_location in Infobox company template. Mduvekot (talk) 11:37, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:56, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:57, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - per nom. shoy (reactions) 17:53, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the article uses way too many primary sources, indicating a problem with notability per WP:CORPDEPTH. Name goes here (talk | contribs) 22:12, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I only moved the page into the mainspace because it seemed to me like it had enough sources, and especially when compared to similar companies like AccessPay and GoCardless. I understand now that it needs more secondary independent sources. Happy to put it back into draft form and see if there will be more secondary independent sources. Zeus678 (talk) 11:10, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.