Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smith, Clark H
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was speedy delete (speedy deletion criterion A7). howcheng {chat} 22:00, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Unverifiable vanity autobiography. I've tried the (not verified) tag, but the author just keeps deleting it. No evidence of published works or independent coverage; Googling Clark+Smith+xenocentrism turns up only 1) this article and 2) a website of neologisms that doesn't even trace the word to him. Delete as WP:BIO. Melchoir 20:47, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete db-bio. So he has a few ideas. So do the other 1000 people in the office complex where I work. And neologism? Amateur neologism is the last refuge of the terminally absent-minded and lexicographically-challenged >:) Avi 21:07, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete and non-notable, unverified bio. Also recommend the terms he supposedly coined be transwikied to wiktionary and deleted.--Isotope23 21:28, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- SD/Transwiki per Isotope.--み使い Mitsukai 21:39, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No claims as to notability are asserted in the article. Neologisims are neither here nor there. WP:BIO refers. (aeropagitica) 21:41, 7 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.