Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something untrustworthy (Book)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Unanimous agreement here even when discounting the sockpuppet. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:30, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Something untrustworthy (Book)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD contested without providing a reason. The subject fails WP:NBOOK and WP:GNG. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:47, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails clearly WP:NBOOK.CommanderWaterford (talk) 12:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete searches in the usual places (library databases, google, newspapers.com, proquest, jstor) came up with no relevant results. Seems to comprehensively fail NBOOK Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete Fails WP:NBOOK RationalPuff (talk) 23:18, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. fails WP:NBOOK. DoctorsHub (talk) 06:30, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sockstrike. Blablubbs|talk 20:17, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as it fails WP:NBOOK. The article appears to have been written by the author of the book, so it also feels quite a bit like WP:SPIP. Jmertel23 (talk) 23:40, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per everyone. As the only reference is a promo page for the book, I see no reason this can't be g11. 174.254.192.112 (talk) 04:10, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.