Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/South Bay Tower
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 01:19, 1 January 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- South Bay Tower (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article hasn't had any substantial updates since 2016 and I can't find any news about the tower after 2011-ish, so I think it can assumed this project was scrapped, and in that case, it's probably not notable enough to remain. LynxesDesmond 🐈 (talk) 01:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Massachusetts. LynxesDesmond 🐈 (talk) 01:19, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with your assessment Sgroey (talk) 02:00, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete I don't see any further news (or anything) about this proposed tower that I think was never built. The small one paragraph now hardly seems worth keeping. Nothing has appeared since the two sources used, and I don't think anything will at this point... Oaktree b (talk) 02:26, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- Delete: Per nom and others. I'm not convinced work for this tower was ever even started based on an apparent lack of news coverage. Bsoyka (talk) 05:31, 25 December 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.